Appearance
The first question a shop asks about a deep hole drilling job is not whether they can make the hole — it is whether they can make money doing it. Deep hole drilling costs cannot be estimated using standard machining rate calculators. The non-linear scaling of cycle time with depth, the high cost of specialised tooling, and the significant risk of rework make cost estimation a specialised skill. Getting it wrong means either leaving money on the table or winning a job that loses money on every hole.
The Cost Structure of Deep Hole Drilling
Cost Components
Deep hole drilling cost per hole breaks down into five primary components:
| Component | Typical Share | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|
| Machine time (cycle time) | 40–60% | Cutting speed, feed rate, depth, number of passes |
| Tooling cost per hole | 15–30% | Tool cost, regrind cycles, tool life in holes |
| Setup and alignment | 10–20% | Part complexity, fixture design, batch size |
| Coolant system | 5–15% | Pressure requirements, filtration, coolant life |
| Inspection and quality | 5–10% | Tolerance requirements, inspection method, frequency |
Machine Time vs. Tooling Cost Trade-off
| Strategy | Machine Time | Tooling Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggressive parameters (high speed/feed) | Lower | Higher (faster wear) | Soft materials, short runs |
| Conservative parameters (low speed/feed) | Higher | Lower (longer tool life) | Hard materials, long runs |
| Balanced | Moderate | Moderate | Most production |
The optimal operating point depends on the shop's specific cost structure. A shop with high machine utilisation and low tooling costs should push harder. A shop with expensive tooling and available machine capacity should run conservatively.
The L/D Ratio Effect on Cost
The depth-to-diameter (L/D) ratio is the single most important factor in deep hole drilling cost estimation. Cost does not scale linearly with L/D.
| L/D Ratio | Classification | Relative Cost Factor (per mm) | Notes | |---|---|---|---|---| | < 5:1 | Standard drilling | 0.3–0.5× | Conventional twist drills; minimal cost premium | | 5:1 – 10:1 | Shallow deep hole | 1.0× (baseline) | Gun drilling or BTA may be required | | 10:1 – 30:1 | Moderate deep hole | 1.5–2.5× | Specialised tooling required; coolant pressure ≥ 80 bar | | 30:1 – 50:1 | Deep hole | 2.5–4.0× | Multiple passes or peck cycles; high coolant pressure | | 50:1 – 100:1 | Extreme deep hole | 4.0–8.0× | Specialised machine; strict process control | | > 100:1 | Ultra-deep | 8.0–20.0× | Maximum capability; highest risk of rework |
Why L/D Ratio Drives Cost Non-Linearly
| Factor | Effect at High L/D |
|---|---|
| Chip evacuation | Longer chip travel path increases friction and risk of packing |
| Coolant pressure loss | Pressure drop along the drill length reduces cutting edge cooling |
| Tool deflection | Longer tool = more deflection = tighter tolerance harder to hold |
| Tool wear | Extended contact time accelerates edge wear |
| Regrind frequency | Shorter intervals between regrinds increase per-hole tool cost |
| Rework risk | Probability of scrapping increases with depth |
WARNING
The cost curve steepens dramatically above 100:1 L/D. If a 50:1 hole costs $50, a 120:1 hole of the same diameter can easily cost $200–400. Always question whether extreme L/D ratios are functionally necessary during the design phase.
Cycle Time Calculation
Basic Machining Time Formula
The fundamental formula for deep hole drilling cycle time:
[ T_m = \frac{L}{f \times n} + T_{approach} + T_{retract} ]
Where:
- ( T_m ) = Machining time (minutes)
- ( L ) = Hole depth (mm)
- ( f ) = Feed per revolution (mm/rev)
- ( n ) = Spindle speed (RPM)
- ( T_{approach} ) = Time to approach from bushing to workpiece
- ( T_{retract} ) = Time to retract from full depth
Typical Cycle Times by Method
| Method | Diameter Range | Typical Feed | Typical Speed | Time for 100 mm Depth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gun drilling, carbide | 3–10 mm | 0.010–0.025 mm/rev | 4,000–10,000 RPM | 0.4–2.5 min |
| Gun drilling, carbide | 10–25 mm | 0.015–0.035 mm/rev | 1,500–4,000 RPM | 0.7–4.0 min |
| BTA drilling | 20–60 mm | 0.020–0.060 mm/rev | 500–2,000 RPM | 0.8–6.0 min |
| EDM drilling | 0.3–3 mm | N/A (erosion rate) | N/A | 5–60 min per 10 mm |
Multi-Pass Cycles
For extreme L/D ratios, deep hole drilling may require multiple passes:
| Configuration | Passes | Time Multiplier | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-pass gun drilling | 1 | 1.0× | Most gun drilling up to 150:1 |
| Gun drilling with peck cycle | 2–5 | 1.3–2.0× | Chip clearing every 50–100 mm |
| BTA with reaming pass | 2 | 1.5–2.0× | Rough drill + finish ream |
| Step drilling (pilot + finish) | 2 | 1.2–1.8× | Gun drill pilot then BTA finish |
Tooling Cost Per Hole
Gun Drill Cost Model
| Cost Component | Example Value |
|---|---|
| New gun drill cost (8 mm solid carbide) | $80–$150 |
| Regrind cost per cycle | $15–$35 |
| Regrinds before scrap | 8–15 |
| Total cost per tool lifecycle | $200–$675 |
| Holes per regrind (steel) | 50–200 |
| Tooling cost per hole | $0.10–$1.50 |
BTA Head Cost Model
| Cost Component | Example Value |
|---|---|
| New BTA head cost (25 mm, carbide) | $150–$400 |
| Insert cost per corner (indexable) | $5–$15 |
| Corners per insert | 3–6 |
| Holes per corner | 20–100 |
| Tooling cost per hole | $0.15–$2.00 |
Material Effect on Tooling Cost
| Material | Tool Life Factor | Relative Tool Cost per Hole |
|---|---|---|
| Low-carbon steel (1018) | 1.0× (baseline) | 1.0× |
| Alloy steel (4140) | 0.5–0.8× | 1.3–2.0× |
| Stainless steel (316L) | 0.3–0.5× | 2.0–3.3× |
| Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) | 0.2–0.3× | 3.3–5.0× |
| Inconel 718 | 0.1–0.2× | 5.0–10.0× |
| Cast iron | 0.8–1.2× | 0.8–1.3× |
| Aluminium | 2.0–4.0× | 0.3–0.5× |
Material Machinability Effect
Relative Machining Time by Material
| Material | Speed Factor | Feed Factor | Relative Cycle Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-carbon steel (1018) | 1.0× | 1.0× | 1.0× (baseline) |
| Alloy steel (4140, 30 HRC) | 0.7–0.9× | 0.8–0.9× | 1.2–1.8× |
| Stainless steel (304) | 0.4–0.6× | 0.6–0.8× | 2.1–4.2× |
| Stainless steel (316L) | 0.3–0.5× | 0.6–0.8× | 2.5–5.6× |
| Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) | 0.2–0.3× | 0.5–0.7× | 4.8–10.0× |
| Inconel 718 | 0.1–0.2× | 0.4–0.6× | 8.3–25.0× |
| Cast iron (grey) | 1.2–1.5× | 1.0–1.2× | 0.6–0.8× |
| Aluminium (6061) | 3.0–5.0× | 1.5–2.0× | 0.1–0.2× |
Cost Multiplier by Material
| Material | Baseline Cost (100 mm × Ø10 mm, L/D 10:1) | Multiplier vs. 1018 Steel |
|---|---|---|
| 1018 steel | $8–$15 | 1.0× |
| 4140 steel | $12–$25 | 1.5–1.7× |
| 316L stainless | $20–$45 | 2.5–3.0× |
| Ti-6Al-4V | $35–$80 | 4.4–5.3× |
| Inconel 718 | $60–$150 | 7.5–10.0× |
| Aluminium 6061 | $3–$8 | 0.4–0.5× |
| Grey cast iron | $5–$12 | 0.6–0.8× |
Cost Comparison Across Methods
Method Selection Cost Guide
| Hole Size | L/D Range | Cheapest Method | Typical Cost per Hole (Steel) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ø0.3–1.0 mm × 10–30 mm | 10:1–50:1 | EDM or laser | $5–$50 |
| Ø1.0–3.0 mm × 30–150 mm | 10:1–100:1 | Gun drilling | $3–$30 |
| Ø3.0–20 mm × 50–500 mm | 10:1–100:1 | Gun drilling | $5–$80 |
| Ø20–60 mm × 100–1,000 mm | 5:1–50:1 | BTA drilling | $10–$150 |
| Ø60–200 mm × 200–2,000 mm | 5:1–30:1 | BTA drilling | $25–$500 |
| Ø200+ mm × 500+ mm | 5:1–20:1 | Trepanning | $100–$2,000 |
Method Cost Comparison (Ø10 mm × 200 mm in 4140 Steel)
| Method | Cycle Time | Tooling Cost | Total Estimated Cost | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gun drilling | 4–8 min | $0.30–$0.80 | $12–$30 | Standard choice |
| BTA drilling | 3–6 min | $0.50–$1.50 | $10–$25 | Higher volume |
| EDM (sinker) | 30–90 min | $1.00–$5.00 | $40–$150 | When conventional drilling impossible |
| Laser drilling | 10–30 min | $2.00–$10.00 | $30–$100 | Very small holes, thin materials |
| Mechanical drilling (peck) | 6–15 min | $0.10–$0.30 | $8–$20 | L/D < 10:1 only |
Setup and Batch Size Effects
Setup Cost Amortisation
| Batch Size | Setup Time (hours) | Setup Cost per Part | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (prototype) | 1–3 | $75–$300 | Full setup cost on one part |
| 10 | 1–3 | $7.50–$30 | Setup amortised over 10 parts |
| 100 | 1–3 | $0.75–$3.00 | Setup is negligible |
| 1,000+ | 1–3 | $0.08–$0.30 | High-volume production |
Small Batch Premium
For small batches, the per-hole cost is dominated by setup and programming:
| Batch Size | Cost Premium vs. 100-piece Run |
|---|---|
| 1 (one-off) | 3–8× |
| 5–10 | 1.5–3× |
| 50–100 | 1.0–1.3× |
| 500+ | 0.7–0.9× (volume discount) |
Cost Estimation Example
Example: Gun Drilling Ø8 mm × 400 mm in 4140 Steel
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Hole diameter | 8 mm |
| Hole depth | 400 mm |
| L/D ratio | 50:1 |
| Material | 4140 alloy steel, 28–32 HRC |
| Machine rate | $85/hour |
Cycle time calculation:
- Cutting speed: 60 m/min → 2,387 RPM
- Feed: 0.020 mm/rev
- Feed rate: 47.7 mm/min
- Machining time: 400 / 47.7 = 8.4 minutes
- Approach + retract: 1.5 minutes
- Total cycle time: 9.9 minutes
Cost breakdown:
| Component | Calculation | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Machine time | 9.9 min × ($85/60) | $14.03 |
| Tooling cost | $120 drill / 12 regrinds + $25/regrind / 80 holes | $0.38 |
| Setup amortised | 1.5 hr × $85 / 50 pcs | $2.55 |
| Coolant and consumables | Estimate | $1.50 |
| Inspection | 2 min × ($85/60) | $2.83 |
| Total estimated cost per hole | $21.29 |
FAQ
Q: What is the most important factor in deep hole drilling cost? The L/D (depth-to-diameter) ratio is the dominant cost driver. Cost scales non-linearly with L/D — a 50:1 hole costs 3–5× more per mm than a 10:1 hole of the same diameter.
Q: How is cycle time calculated for gun drilling? Cycle time = hole depth / (feed per revolution × RPM) + approach time + retract time. Multi-pass or peck cycles add significant time.
Q: What is the typical machine hourly rate for deep hole drilling? $60–$150 per hour depending on machine type, with specialised deep hole drilling machines at the higher end. CNC machining centres with high-pressure coolant capability are typically $80–$120/hour.
Q: How much does a gun drill cost? A solid carbide gun drill costs $80–$300 depending on diameter, length, and coating. BTA heads range from $150–$800. Each regrind costs $15–$50 and a drill can be reground 8–15 times before scrapping.
Q: Which method is cheapest for deep hole drilling? Gun drilling is generally the cheapest for small diameters (Ø1–20 mm). BTA drilling is most economical for larger diameters (Ø20–60 mm). EDM is significantly more expensive and should only be used when conventional drilling is not possible.
Q: How does material affect deep hole drilling cost? Material affects both cycle time (lower speeds for harder materials) and tool life (faster wear). Compared to low-carbon steel, titanium costs 4–5× more per hole and Inconel costs 7–10× more.
Q: How much does setup add to deep hole drilling cost? Setup typically costs $75–$300 per job. For single prototypes, setup dominates the cost. For batches of 100+, setup cost per part becomes negligible.
Q: Is deep hole drilling more expensive than conventional drilling? For L/D ratios under 5:1, conventional drilling is cheaper. Above 10:1 L/D, specialised deep hole methods become necessary, and the cost premium can be 2–10× depending on the application.
Q: How can I reduce deep hole drilling costs? Reduce L/D ratio if possible, choose more machinable materials, optimise parameters for maximum tool life rather than speed, increase batch sizes, and specify tolerances no tighter than functionally required.
Q: What is the cost difference between gun drilling and EDM for deep holes? For the same hole, gun drilling is typically 3–10× cheaper than EDM. EDM should only be specified when the material is too hard for conventional drilling or when the hole geometry (very small diameter, curved, or shaped) prevents mechanical drilling.