Appearance
Three machines across three sites creates 9× the coordination effort of three machines at one site. Standardisation is the key — identical machines, shared procedures, and centralised spares. Without it, each site reinvents the wheel at triple the cost.
The Multi-Site Challenge
| Factor | Single Site (3 machines) | Multi-Site (3 sites × 1 machine) |
|---|---|---|
| Procurement | 1 PO, 3 machines | 3 POs, 1 machine each |
| Installation coordination | 1 project manager | 3 project managers |
| Training | 1 program, 1 location | 3 programs, 3 locations |
| Spare parts inventory | 1 stock location | 3 stock locations |
| Process documentation | 1 set of procedures | 3 sets (likely inconsistent) |
| Support structure | 1 on-site team | 3 teams or centralised |
| Knowledge transfer | Natural (shared floor) | Requires formal system |
Site Selection and Assessment
Site Assessment Checklist
| Category | Assessment Items |
|---|---|
| Floor space | Machine footprint, coolant system, staging area, expansion room |
| Foundation | Load rating, floor flatness, isolation requirements |
| Utilities | Power capacity (kVA), compressed air, water supply, drainage |
| Crane capacity | Overhead crane or hoist for loading and maintenance |
| Environmental | Coolant disposal, chip handling, ventilation |
| Workforce | Available operators, maintenance skill level, shift structure |
| Local support | Distributor proximity, service availability, spare parts access |
Site Readiness Scoring
Score each site 1–5 in each category. Minimum average of 3.5 and no single category below 2.5.
Machine Standardisation Strategy
What to Standardise
| Element | Standardisation Level | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Machine model and configuration | Identical across sites | Common spares, common training |
| CNC control type | Same brand and model | Programs transfer without modification |
| Coolant system | Same pump, tank, filtration | Common spares, common troubleshooting |
| Tooling system | Same bushing, holder system | Tools and fixtures interchangeable |
| Spare parts kit | Same starter kit per machine | Centralised procurement |
What Can Differ by Site
- Local electrical configuration (voltage, frequency, phase)
- Coolant type (based on local water quality and disposal regulations)
- Chip handling method (based on local recycling infrastructure)
- Training language (for non-English-speaking locations)
Rollout Planning
Phased Rollout
| Phase | Activities | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Pilot | First machine at primary site — validate process, train lead operators | Month 1–4 |
| Phase 2: Stabilise | Run pilot for 3 months, collect data, refine SOPs | Month 5–7 |
| Phase 3: Replicate | Install machine at site 2 with pilot-trained operator support | Month 8–10 |
| Phase 4: Scale | Install remaining machines with lessons from Phase 2–3 | Month 11–16 |
Documentation Package per Site
- Site-specific installation plan
- Utility connection specifications
- Foundation drawing adapted to local conditions
- Commissioning checklist
- Training schedule and materials
Training at Scale
Training Model for Multi-Site
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Train the trainer | Train 2–3 lead operators at pilot site, they train others | Large deployments (10+ machines) |
| Centralised training | All operators train at one location | Regions with good travel connections |
| On-site training | Manufacturer trains at each site | Remote locations, small teams |
| Hybrid | Centralised theory + on-site practical | Most effective approach |
Knowledge Management
- Central repository for SOPs, programs, and troubleshooting guides
- Regular video calls between site leads to share lessons
- Annual user group meeting for all deep hole drilling operators
- Shared log of process improvements (what worked, what did not)
Support Model
Centralised vs Decentralised Support
| Function | Centralised | Decentralised |
|---|---|---|
| Spare parts procurement | Central purchasing — volume discount | Emergency buys at premium pricing |
| Technical support | Central engineering hotline | Local distributor |
| Maintenance planning | Central scheduling | Local execution |
| Process engineering | Central team develops, sites adopt | Local teams develop independently |
| Continuous improvement | Central coordination, site implementation | Site-driven |
Recommended: Hybrid Model
- Central procurement and engineering (scale benefits)
- Local execution and first-line support (response time)
- Central escalation for complex issues (expertise concentration)
FAQ
When does multi-site make sense?
When total annual hole volume exceeds 5,000 holes across multiple locations, or when shipping work between sites is impractical (large parts, long distances, customer-specific requirements).
How many machines justify a dedicated support team?
4–6 machines at a single site justify a dedicated maintenance technician. 8–12 machines justify a full-time process engineer.
Should I use the same machine model at all sites?
Yes — unless specific site requirements (power availability, floor space, local materials) require different configurations. Standardisation reduces total cost by 15–25%.
How do I transfer knowledge between sites?
Assign one process owner responsible for cross-site knowledge transfer. Monthly video calls, shared documentation repository, and an annual in-person meeting.
What is the biggest risk in multi-site deployment?
Loss of process control. Without standardisation, each site develops its own methods, and quality divergence is rapid. Enforce SOP compliance through regular audits.
Multi-site deployment strategies depend on company size, geographic spread, and production requirements. Adapt this framework to your specific situation. This article reflects industry practice as of 2026.